Can anyone recommend a user friendly email client for a small business? I work out of several offices and need to access emails from any computer.
I dont think I'm being overly fussy with functionality, basically I need it to be able to create folders and sub-folders for easy storage of mail, display the from address as my business email (not “sent on behalf of”) and automatically put in my business signature regardless of what email address I am using as the from address.
GMX is ok – but cant set my email address as default “from” address and can only have a signature attached to the @gmx address. which is really annoying having to remember to change the from address and copy and paste my signature every time I send an email.
Gmail was pretty good, but when you reply it wants to put your reply at the bottom of the conversation not the top and that cant be changed (according to them) and also sends email from the @gmail address and says “on behalf of ….”
The client provided for webmail by the people who host my website was by comparison not too bad. I originally started trying others because it was REALLY slow and unresponsive, doesn't allow you to create sub-folders in email storage or put contacts into groups (that was the worst part, I keep forgetting people when emailing a group!).
Maybe I am asking too much of a free client! any suggestions?
Thank you to anyone who takes the time to read and respond!
I would suggest you to check Banckle Email Server which is a web based email application, it is most secure email application which allow you to make folders and you can also send/receive audio/ video emails with it.
000webhost.com/431018.html
I read it but still not gettin ur exact point.Y ru nt comfortable with gmail?
i dont know any webbased but there are software ones :
thunderbird . its free and easy or u could try out look
Screenshot of Grossman’s proof-of-concept test of new AutoFill exploit
Grossman now reports that he has discovered another similar AutoFill security issue that, while requiring the malicious party to trick users into providing a pair of keystrokes rather than being completely automated as in the previous exploit, offers an even more efficient means for users’ personal information to be obtained.
To perform our attack requires tiny bit of end-user trickery. Two button presses to be precise. A malicious website detects (ie: IP address) the country the victim is from. For our purposes here we’ll assume the “US.” The attacker invisibly (CSS transparency) sets up the aforementioned form and forces the keystroke focus into the country element. Notice how this is done in the video on the right side of the screen, which only visible for demonstration purposes. Next the attacker entices the victim to type “U” (first character of “US”) and then press “TAB.” And BAM! That’s it! Data stolen.
Grossman relates that he notified Apple of the newly-discovered exploit via email on August 10th and again a few days later. One week after that, he received a phone call from an Apple product security engineer with whom he had a “productive chat” about how the original vulnerability report from June had been handled, only to discover at the end of the conversation that the engineer had no idea that Grossman had reported the second issue a week and half prior.
As with the earlier exploit, users can protect themselves by simply turning off the AutoFill option to automatically populate forms with information from their Address Book cards. Grossman notes, however, that he is unsure how Apple plans to address the vulnerability while still maintaining the convenience of the AutoFill feature. While Apple’s previous patch allowed Safari to automatically differentiate from the automated JavaScript-simulated keystrokes from real keystrokes, thus thwarting the original exploit, the new exploit relies on tricking the user into actually entering the necessary keystroke, a tactic that could be more difficult to address.
Powered By iWebRSS.com
Mashable first reported on the Wi-Fi phone syncing topic earlier this week amidst the excitement of the iPhone 4 launch, noting that Jobs replied “Yep, someday,” to a question from a customer about possible future wireless syncing of his iPhone to his Mac. Jobs offered no timeframe for a launch of the feature.
Earlier this year, one developer created his own Wi-Fi syncing solution and hoped that Apple would distribute it through the App Store, but the company rejected the application last month. It is now available for jailbroken devices connecting to both Mac and Windows computers at a price of $9.99.
The second issue comes to our attention via TechCrunch, which points to a LiveJournal posting from a user who asked about the removal of the “hold” button from the iPhone’s on-screen calling screen to make room for a new button for initiating FaceTime video calls. Jobs’ response: “Hold doesnt do anything more than Mute.”
Table from Page 50 of iPhone OS 3.1 User Guide (PDF link)
Interestingly, Jobs was neither entirely correct nor thorough in his answer. As noted in Apple’s own user guide for devices running iPhone OS 3.1, the “mute” functionality silences the user’s own voice in the conversation while continuing to allow them to hear the party on the other end of the line. The “hold” functionality silences both ends of the conversation.
Fortunately for users looking to make use of the hold functionality that seemed to have disappeared, a commenter on the TechCrunch piece notes that simply holding down the “mute” button for a few seconds will activate the “hold” functionality.